Developing an argument dissertation
Although this is not required in all academic essays, it is a good rule of thumb. Decisions about style of presentation may need to be made about, for example: whether you want to begin with an initial overview of the results, followed by the detail, or whether you move immediately into the detail of the results; in which order you will be presenting the detailed results; and what balance, in terms of word space, you want to achieve across the spread of results that you have.
Another technique to improve academic writing style is to ensure that each individual paragraph justifies its inclusion. It can be difficult to identify the best order for sections in this chapter because the rationale for your choice of specific research question can be complicated, and there may be several inter-linked reasons why the research is needed. Essay structure is guided by its content and argument so every essay will pose unique structural challenges, but the skill of getting a clear and articulate argument across is an important part of the writing process. Research questions quiz. There is usually some work to be done to convince your reader that there is a connection - i. Are the connections any more than coincidence? It can be best to write the Abstract last, once you are sure what exactly you are summarising. Avoid vague language and broad ideas, and be clear about what, who, where and when your question addresses. You must give enough detail for another researcher to replicate your study. Improving the structure and content Once you have the dissertation in draft form it becomes easier to see where you can improve it. Chapter s describing methods, sources, material etc In these chapters a straightforward description is required of how you conducted the research. As you go, you can slot in ideas, references, quotes, clarifications, and conclusions as they occur to you, to make sure they are not forgotten. As you edit and rewrite your dissertation you will probably gain and lose references that you had in earlier versions.
Some arguments will be more central than others, but all need to be treated reasonably. Provides scope for debate and deliberation The answer to the question should not just be a simple statement of fact: there needs to be space for you to discuss and interpret what you found.
However, some elements are to be expected in all fields regardless of the research question or the literature, and these include logic, coherence, careful use of evidence and clarity.
If you used particular equipment, processes, or materials, you will need to be clear and precise in how you describe them. But it is entirely normal and very healthy! Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Plan a structure that will enable you to present your argument effectively. Next compare the inferences made from the theory with those you can now make having identified fallacies in the theory; suggest improvements; and conclude by summarising the key themes without repeating everything. Decisions about style of presentation may need to be made about, for example: whether you want to begin with an initial overview of the results, followed by the detail, or whether you move immediately into the detail of the results; in which order you will be presenting the detailed results; and what balance, in terms of word space, you want to achieve across the spread of results that you have. For Dummies: The Podcast. While you do this, be aware of whether you need to increase the number of words, or decrease it to reach your target.
It should tell what you plan to argue, and it should "telegraph" how you plan to argue—that is, what particular support for your claim is going where in your essay.
You can refer back to the rationale that you gave for your research in the literature review, and discuss what your own research has added in this context.
Whichever route you choose, you must ensure logical links through your argument.
based on 62 review